I did try to bridge them, at the time, the system would not do it. Never found out why.
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 14:57, Steve Holdoway <[email protected]> wrote: > My first thought was 'why not bridge them and allocate both addresses to > the ridged pair??' > > Steve > > On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 13:49 -0600, John Schultz wrote: > > That is ultimately what I was afraid of. > > > > I tried several months ago (before I started working on the PXE and > > UDEV issues) with no luck. > > > > It eventually destabilized the node and then the networking died. > > > > On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 12:56, Gustin Johnson <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > In that case, you need to be careful about your routing table, > > especially if dhcp is involved. Either one of you may wish to > > change > > your DHCP client to something else, like the ISC one and then > > configure which aspects get configured. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 12:24 PM, John Schultz > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Actually, not at all... > > > > > > Roberto's and ultimately my situation are completely > > different. Roberto's > > > situation sounds like a segmentation issue. Mine will be > > similar, however I > > > am using one wireless network for a backhual, the second > > wireless network or > > > client connectitivity and the hardwire ethernet as a uplink > > to the internet > > > or another network.. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Voyage-linux mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://list.voyage.hk/mailman/listinfo/voyage-linux > > -- > Steve Holdoway <[email protected]> > http://www.greengecko.co.nz > MSN: [email protected] > Skype: sholdowa > >
_______________________________________________ Voyage-linux mailing list [email protected] http://list.voyage.hk/mailman/listinfo/voyage-linux
