On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Zenny <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah, I tried like what Jonathan and Jon explained in 0.8, but failed
> miserably. I want to roll back to the standard kernel what squeeze
> officially supports, and trying to install the 2.6.32-6 kernel has
> been a pain in the ass for the last few days.
>
> Actually, there is no clear documentation on how to use SDK and that
> confused me a while.
>
> On 12/16/11, Jonathan Polom <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Jon Meek <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Jonathan Polom <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I just started using Voyage MPD last week and quite like it, except
>>>> for one flaw I've found: building kernel modules for proprietary
>>>> drivers. The only problem I'm having (and this is not a voyage issue,
>>>> I had the same problem when I ran Debian stable) is that my wired NIC,
>>>> which is a lovely Realtek 8111/8168 series controller, uses the
>>>> problematic r8169 kernel module. The r8169 module is effectively broke
>>>> for my NIC and causes it to up/down the link randomly and drop a lot
>>>> of incoming packets. Obviously this is not acceptable and I need to
>>>> fix it. The accepted fix at this time is to use the r8168 module
>>>> provided by Realtek. Realtek provides the "source" for this driver on
>>>> their web site to be compiled as a kernel module and there's also an
>>>> r8168-dkms package in the Debian sid repos.
>>>>
>>>> So far I've had no success compiling the r8168 module from the Realtek
>>>> tarball or from the DKMS package out of sid (all deps are satisfied
>>>> for that package). I've installed the kernel source for the
>>>> 3.0.0-voyage kernel, untarred it to /usr/src/linux-source-3.0.0-voyage
>>>> and symlinked /usr/src/linux to it, but DKMS consistently claims that
>>>> it doesn't think the source for the kernel is installed when I run
>>>> `dpkg-reconfigure r8168-dkms`. I've tried compiling the module
>>>> directly from the Realtek source via their autorun.sh script, but it
>>>> looks in /lib/modules/3.0.0-voyage/build for something that isn't
>>>> there (not too sure what *should* be there even, I've tried symlinking
>>>> the kernel sources there but that doesn't work either). I've never had
>>>> this much trouble trying to compile a kernel module before, especially
>>>> in Debian.
>>>>
>>>> I searched my configured apt repos (squeeze, sid and voyage) for
>>>> available kernel headers and couldn't find one for the voyage kernel
>>>> (why isn't one available by default? that seems odd, especially so
>>>> since you're offering a kernel source package) since you really don't
>>>> need the full source tree available to compile a module in most cases.
>>>> I did find what looks like a kernel headers package in the voyage
>>>> experimental repository for the 3.0.0-voyage kernel. But I have to
>>>> ask: why is the headers package for the default voyage kernel
>>>> considered experimental? Will that package allow me to compile modules
>>>> against the headers it contains or are there some known issues with
>>>> it?
>>>>
>>>> So my main question here is: How is one supposed to compile a third
>>>> party/out-of-tree kernel module on voyage for the voyage kernel?
>>>>
>>>> Any help is appreciated on this topic.
>>>>
>>>> Jon
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is how I compiled the e1000e driver from Intel's tarball for
>>> Voyage 0.7.5. Note that this was done to fix an auto-negotiation
>>> problem that was actually due to a bad UTP cable.
>>>
>>> Since I did not want to significantly increase the size of my USB
>>> image, I built the driver on my mpd server which is a PC Engines ALIX
>>> board.
>>>
>>> On the ALIX board, where some development tools are already installed.
>>>
>>>  sudo apt-get update
>>>  sudo apt-get upgrade
>>>
>>>  sudo apt-get install linux-headers-`uname -r`
>>>
>>>  sudo reboot
>>>
>>> Log back in and move to an appropriate directory:
>>>
>>>  cd build
>>>
>>>  tar zxf ../dist/e1000e-1.6.3.tar.gz
>>>
>>>  sudo ln -s /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.38-voyage /usr/src/linux
>>>
>>>  make
>>>
>>> Then grab the compiled driver (mpd:~/build/e1000e-1.6.3/src/e1000e.ko)
>>> and get it to the target system (running USB system).
>>>
>>> On the USB system, verify what driver we are using:
>>>
>>>  dmesg | egrep e1000e
>>>   [    0.971963] e1000e: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - 1.2.20-k2
>>>
>>> Backup the original driver:
>>>
>>>  sudo cp -pi
>>> /lib/modules/2.6.38-voyage/kernel/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000e.ko
>>> /lib/modules/2.6.38-voyage/kernel/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000e.ko.orig
>>>
>>> Copy new driver into the modules directory
>>>
>>>  sudo cp -p ~/dist/e1000e.ko
>>> /lib/modules/2.6.38-voyage/kernel/drivers/net/e1000e
>>>
>>>  sudo /sbin/depmod -a
>>>
>>>  sudo dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-2.6.38-voyage
>>>
>>>  sudo reboot
>>>
>>> Log back in and verify that the new version is running:
>>>
>>>  dmesg | egrep e1000e
>>>  [    0.886074] e1000e: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - 1.6.3-NAPI
>>>
>>> Success!
>>>
>>> Jon (a different one...)
>>>
>>
>> Did you have to configure additional apt repositories to find the
>> linux-headers package? I did an apt-cache search headers and didn't
>> find any header packages for the voyage kernel, only the debian
>> kernels. I'm using voyage 0.8 if that matters which uses the
>> 3.0.0-voyage kernel. The appropriate headers package would be
>> linux-headers-3.0.0-voyage and that doesn't seem to exist. From
>> memory, I have the squeeze repos, voyage repos and sid repos (for the
>> r8168-dkms package) in sources.list. I will downgrade if necessary as
>> I don't require bleeding edge anything for this device.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Voyage-linux mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://list.voyage.hk/mailman/listinfo/voyage-linux
>>

Alright, so I'm not the only one having this problem. That's good I
guess. It sounds like the voyage 3.0.0 kernel is not complete at this
point then (missing essential packages for module building). I will
try 0.7.5 since it seems it works to compile modules against. They
need to get a kernel headers package for 0.8 or else list it as
development (not even rc material in my book). But why can't I build
the DKMS module against the kernel source? Is there something I need
to do to prepare the source? I tried running make oldconfig but that
bombed out due to lack of essential support files. Is it completely
not normal to compile kernel modules against the full kernel source?

_______________________________________________
Voyage-linux mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.voyage.hk/mailman/listinfo/voyage-linux

Reply via email to