Hello Uffe Holst,
your comments on [voyager] Voyager does not crash - the cache browser on the other
hand does..
>It was by accident that I started the cache browser (you know a quick
>rcommand-m to change from the WB to the YAM screen and then a lcommand-l to
>send the message later, and I had naturally forgotten Voyager was running
>too and that a lcommand-l not exactly has the same meaning in Voyager as in
>YAM when the Voyager screen turned up instead of the YAM screen). Well,
>back to the cache browser. If Voyager can scan the cache in 15 seconds why
>do the cache browser use 6 minutes? And why does it crash (8000000B) when
>it is finished scanning? (stupid as I am I naturally had to see if I could
>repeat the crash, which I could).
Just tried it here.... No problem. Voyager 2.96.7
Cache browser 2.0b9
Arq 1.83
Magic Exchange
MCP
Print manager
Vclock
Madhouse
I would say that Voyager is far more stable than any other Amiga
browser and certainly more stable than the PC offerings. IMHO
___________________________________________________
Phil Ellis Amiga 4000/040 PIV Magellan II
For information on Cystic Fibrosis
http://web.ukonline.co.uk/philllip.ellis/contents.htm
---------------------------------------------------
"I bet you can't guess what this does"
____________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - Info & Archive: http://www.vapor.com/
For Listserver Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP"
To Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "UNSUBSCRIBE"
