On 26 May 99 20:33:21 -0500, you wrote:
>Hello Andreas Mas Marques, on 26-May-99 15:12:10, you said,
>
>>> With secure server forms, most times it is regarded as not good
>>policy to
>>> allow a back button to take you to a filled in form, even if you are
>>the one
>>> who filled it in.
>>>
>>> On Buy.com and others, there is even a warning that doing so may
>>cause you
>>> to get billed twice for the same product. Just a word of warning.
>>>
>
>>O.k., I agree on that one.
>>Another *example*: I want to post a response to an message at the
>>German "Amiga-Club Forum" (http.//www.amiga-club.de/forum/forum.html).
>>While writing, I decide to have another look at the original message I
>>want to respond to. I either would have to open a new Voyager window
>>(for the form or the forum) or forget to do that and press the
>>"Back"-button after having written 99% of the text which is then lost
>>in nirvana. I apologize for being that forgetful, but after regularily
>>using Netscape at work I don't always think of the potentially
>>vanishing data when I'm at home.
>
>>So, if "form data-caching" (or whatever one might call it) will
>>(ever) be integrated into Voyager, it should be possible to manually
>>or automatically (on https: sites) deactivate it. I'm sure a lot of
>>Voyager-users have demand for this feature.
>
>>Regards
>>Andreas
>>--
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>http://www2.rz.hu-berlin.de/~h0444uwh/
>
>>____________________________________________________________
>
>My thinking would be that you could go back and forth as many times as
>necessary and still be retained then once sent .. POOF! blank..
>From experience of being charged twice after reading the warning
in IE, it doesn't always work like that.
--
Gary Peake
http://www.OwlNet.Net
Team AMIGA
--
____________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - Info & Archive: http://www.vapor.com/
For Listserver Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP"
To Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "UNSUBSCRIBE"