On 04-Oct-99,* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*, created these True Words Of Wisdom:
> but I must admit that IB is much more stable on my system than V3,
I would say there are about the same, now, on my system.
> has
> some very nice things (am I the only one who loves the 'Open new browser'
> functionnality ? ), is amazingly fast in table decoding,
> and that except window class support missing in JS, no Flash, no
> CSS/DHTML, and occasional crashes when using the tabs, I don't have much
> to complain with it...
I will "complain" here, since it is part of the discussion.... seems that
a lot of the JavaScript used has strange commands. I still cannot
access the places at the bottom of:
http://www.cwk.image.net
I keep getting an indicator that lines in the JS on that site is strange.
: (((
> Hey V3 is great, is doesn't need to be compared to its concurrency to
> appear as a great browser.
No doubt, it is. Both IBrowse and Voyager have strengths. Good
to see that we can have both!
Gil
Ciao
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Gil Knutson's Pride and Joy ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
------- member of TAEN, The Amiga Education Network --------
------------ check it out at http://www.taen.org -------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Team *AMIGA* - Sardis, BC, Canada
A3000/30/2+16+8 RAM+245 meg Maxtor+1.0 gig Seagate+ZIP Drive
MFCardIII+GVC 56k v.90 VoiceFax Modem+Lexmark 4039 10R+16meg
THOR, MUI, MWB, Voyager3, AmIRC, AmFTP (all reg)
~~~~~~~~~~~ The Amiga Shall Inherit the Earth ~~~~~~~~~~~~
"There are so many.... I'm saving a hard time choosing." -- Mulder
____________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - Info & Archive: http://www.vapor.com/
For Listserver Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP"
To Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "UNSUBSCRIBE"
