"Samuel Byford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically the W3 site doesnt decide which html format to check the
> specs against by the 3.2 or 4.0 or 4.01 part of the DTD - it does it
> purely on the URL provided (hence: no url - everything errors).
You obviously don't know what a DTD *is*. Look it up.
An SGML is useless without it's DTD. And the DTD *is* the file that the URL points to.
The line at the top of the HTML that you're referring to is simply telling whatever's
parsing it where to find the DTD to use.
It's not unreasonable for them to use a DTD that's on their site. They did effectively
invent the thing after all...
> Line 17, column 67:
> ... R="0" FRAMESPACING="0" FRAMEBORDER="no" BORDER="0">
> Error: duplicate specification of attribute "FRAMEBORDER"
>
> Line 19, column 72:
> ... 0,*" FRAMEBORDER="0" FRAMESPACING="0" FRAMEBORDER="no" BORDER="0">
> Error: duplicate specification of attribute "FRAMEBORDER"
Well, they clearly ARE duplicated. Seems a bit weird to use *both* formats in the same
tag....
Rob
_____________________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - http://v3.vapor.com/
Voyager FAQ....: http://faq.vapor.com/voyager/
Listserver Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=HELP
Unsubscribe....: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=UNSUBSCRIBE
