On 14-Feb-01, Norbert Roth wrote:
>
> Hello Ingo,
>
> on 14-Feb-01 you wrote :
>
> ...snipp[good and bad HTML examples]
>
>> I know that this is better (not mentioning missing quotes) but
>> it is simply not showning correctly in both IE & NS. That's
>> what I mean. What does it profit to me to have it all correctly
>> but no browser supports it? I never stated it is not possible
>> to code it correctly.
>
> I realize your problem, but if IE and NS aren't able to show
> HTML code correctly , which adheres to the specs, well who's
> fault is it then?
>
> I know it sounds not satisfying, you should complain
> at Microsoft and NetScape. IMHO there's no other way...
What about coding it the MSIE/NS way and amending the html docs next
revision?
That is what will happen.
>
> You only got two (maybe more) choices:
>
> - producing HTML which is W3 compliant,
> and don't care about IE or NS, or whatever
> browser sucks in that respect
>
> - producing HTML which is recognized
> by the majority of 'systems', resulting
> in IE/NS-compability, but risking that
> HTML compliant browser won't work correct
>
There is bo such thing as a HTML compliant browser. HTML is currently
changing constantly, to add new features. What is compliant on hte date
of release will not maintain compliance very long.
> Regards
>
> NR
--
Bob Q
Rocket Scientist during the day,
Amiga Afficionado all night.
_____________________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - http://v3.vapor.com/
Voyager FAQ....: http://faq.vapor.com/voyager/
Listserver Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=HELP
Unsubscribe....: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=UNSUBSCRIBE
