Hello Uffe

On 01-Jan-02, you wrote:

> 
> 
> In a message of 01-Jan-02 Ian Greenway wrote:
> 
>> Excellent, I look forward to it.  Dropping back to the V3.2.13 release
>> has reminded me just how much better the newer versions really are!
> 
> I regularly drop back to 3.2.13. The JS implementation in 3.2.13 was not
> very good, meaning that JS in general never worked. However, in 3.3.117
> the JS is much better, but still not complete, meaning that I sometime
> encounter sites where the JS work to some extent.

This is defined behaviour. We have intentionally not implemented certain
JS features to make your browsing experience a pain in the ass. Please
stand by while I introduce many typographical errors into the source to
increase your enjoyment :)

Really, JS is coming along now.. as soon as I work out how Olli implements
returning arrays and some other stuff, I'll be filling in the gaps for all
the "missing" functions in the Array class, for instance. And someone will
probably fix the document.cookie readonly "feature", and after some minor
fixes to the select/option class will probably make those writable too..

And then a bunch of event handlers for various objects (onMouseOver for
buttons etc.) need doing.. and then I think that's pretty much all I can think
of that needs finishing off apart from quirks and bugs..

Not much really, is it?

-- 
Matt

_____________________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - http://v3.vapor.com/
Voyager FAQ....: http://faq.vapor.com/voyager/
Listserver Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=HELP
Unsubscribe....: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=UNSUBSCRIBE

Reply via email to