In a message of 20-Nov-03 Matt Sealey wrote: > Voyager's big discrepency is in it's DOM implementation, > not the ability to execute Javascript. Certain operations > are not implemented fully (function calls across framesets) > but then again certain functionality *is* implemented to > much greater degree of compatibility and completeness than > IBrowse (event handlers, for example)
I do believe that you are fully correct on this. However, as a user I really don't care about such. What I care about is that the browser works with the sites I like to view. And the fact is that IBrowse works a lot better on JS sites than Voyager does. Even though I liked the feel of Voyager a lot better than the feel of any of the other Amiga browser, I have switched completely to IBrowse. With IBrowse I am actually able to browse most sites. -- Uffe Holst
