Hi, Keith

I have built a VPP version 16.09+this fix patch and upload it to my personal 
repo, our sfc104 demo will use this to fix it. Once 17.01 is ready for use, we 
will switch to 17.01, thank you so much for taking it seriously.

From: Keith Burns [mailto:alaga...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2016 1:15 AM
To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com>; Dave Barach (dbarach) <dbar...@cisco.com>
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/2428/ isn't included in 16.09

Yi,

Putting the list back on.

I don’t see significant justification from you to do a respin.

i.e. “NSH doesn’t work” (sic ODL SFC) isn’t enough justification. Is ODL SFC 
looking to do a respin?

How come this wasn’t caught sooner, as in, we all got feedback that ODL SFC -> 
HC -> VPP + NSH_SFC was working for SFF functionality.

Can this wait for 17.01 ?

What is the scope of the issue? i.e. how many other projects are impacted and 
can you explain the scope of the issue?

Is there a JIRA bug for instance?



From: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com><mailto:yi.y.y...@intel.com>
Reply: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com><mailto:yi.y.y...@intel.com>
Date: November 3, 2016 at 6:37:47 PM
To: Keith Burns <alaga...@gmail.com><mailto:alaga...@gmail.com>, Dave Barach 
(dbarach) <dbar...@cisco.com><mailto:dbar...@cisco.com>
Subject:  RE: [vpp-dev] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/2428/ isn't included in 16.09


Thanks, Keith, Vpp Weekly Meeting  time is too late for me, so I can’t make it.

Dave, you’re vpp PTL, can you help build vpp 16.09.01 with this fix?

From: Keith Burns [mailto:alaga...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 10:11 PM
To: Dave Barach (dbarach) <dbar...@cisco.com<mailto:dbar...@cisco.com>>; Yang, 
Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com<mailto:yi.y.y...@intel.com>>; 
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/2428/ isn't included in 16.09

Yi,

Looks like this was submitted the day of RC0 but didn't get to review until a 
bit after.

1. This is why I sent multiple emails along the lines of RC0 is coming
2. Post that, you needed a bug ID and a cherry-pick.

As for a respin this mechanically should be easier now we are on Nexus Pro BUT 
I'm unsure of the implications to other projects who may be using 16.09 
artifacts and I believe we would want to respin this as 16.09.01 or some such. 
I'll defer to others with more experience

Do please come to vpp meeting
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016, 6:08 AM Dave Barach (dbarach) 
<dbar...@cisco.com<mailto:dbar...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Please attend the vpp project meeting today at 11:00 AM to discuss this request.

Thanks… Dave

From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io> 
[mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io>] On 
Behalf Of Yang, Yi Y
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 9:01 AM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: [vpp-dev] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/2428/ isn't included in 16.09

Hi, guys

Although vpp 16.09 is released on Sep 16, but https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/2428/ 
isn’t included in it, so ODL sfc can’t work correctly with 16.09 debian repo, 
anybody can help cherry-pick https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/2428/ to 16.09 branch 
and rebuild 16.09 binary packages for Ubuntu 14.04?
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Reply via email to