Hi Padmini, To me this looks like the same thing indeed.
There is currently support for the reflexive behaviour already in the L2 switching scenario (if you supply action = 2 in the ACL rules *and* have the ACL in the opposite direction, then the session lookup is done before the ACL lookup). The only thing was that I wrote that code before the interface deletion was available, so I think it won't cooperate well with that case. Also, in the meantime there were other infrastructure changes in the meantime, so for the L3+L2 support, I am making a new, more compact and tighter infra - I plan to first use it for adding L3 support with IPv6 EH, then after we get it ironed out, I will rollover the L2 code path to using it as well, and remove the old infra (I estimate this all should save about a third of the code size). If you wanna give a try to the new L3 code early on, give a shout, I will be happy to put you in the loop - it should be ready by the end of the week. --a On 3/16/17, Padmini <padmini.rama...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Andrew Yourtchenko, > I see that you are assigned to vpp-514. Is this the same as > the vpp-428, which is raised to add the reflexive ACL like feature to VPP. > > Thanks and regards > Padmini > _______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
