Hi Ray, The problem still exists, Is there any problem in reply message?
Thanks, xyxue From: Kinsella, Ray Date: 2017-05-18 19:05 To: 薛欣颖; nranns; Damjan Marion CC: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Failed to ping between two VPP Hi Xyxue, Please try this patch to see if it helps. https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6758/1 Ray K On 18/05/2017 09:28, 薛欣颖 wrote: > Hi neale, > > 'failed' means this : > DBGvpp# ping 192.168.153.130 > > Statistics: 300 sent, 0 received, 100% packet loss > > what I know is in'run_ping_ip46_address', L598 got the wrong event_type > > I'm not running with multiple worker threads. > > My two vpp is in two 14.04 > ubuntu,The two host interfaces are in the two VPP. The two interfaces > connect directly. > > Thanks, > xyxue > > > *From:* Neale Ranns (nranns) <mailto:nra...@cisco.com> > *Date:* 2017-05-17 16:27 > *To:* 薛欣颖 <mailto:xy...@fiberhome.com>; Damjan Marion > <mailto:dmarion.li...@gmail.com> > *CC:* vpp-dev <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>; Dave Barach (dbarach) > <mailto:dbar...@cisco.com> > *Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] Failed to ping between two VPP > > > > Hi Xyxue, > > > > I don’t understand what has ‘failed’ here. > > The trace shows an echo-reply packet was received, matched against > and outstanding request and punted. > > > > If you are running with multiple worker threads, you’ll need to include; > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6736/ > > > > the difference in the FIB output from 17.04 to 17.01 is not an > error, it’s just that the rewrite string on the adjacency is no > longer pretty printed/decoded. > > > > Regards, > > neale > > > > *From: *薛欣颖<xy...@fiberhome.com> > *Date: *Wednesday, 17 May 2017 at 02:07 > *To: *Damjan Marion <dmarion.li...@gmail.com> > *Cc: *vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, "Dave Barach (dbarach)" > <dbar...@cisco.com>, "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> > *Subject: *Re: Re: [vpp-dev] Failed to ping between two VPP > > > > > > > > I sorry to copy the eth2's packet,that is the eth1's packet in vpp1: > > 00:02:32:132870: af-packet-input > af_packet: hw_if_index 1 next-index 4 > tpacket2_hdr: > status 0x20000001 len 60 snaplen 60 mac 66 net 80 > sec 0x591b9b2d nsec 0x70a3271 vlan 0 > 00:02:32:134189: ethernet-input > IP4: 00:0c:29:8f:ad:61 -> 00:0c:29:31:29:ae > 00:02:32:134247: ip4-input > ICMP: 192.168.153.131 -> 192.168.153.130 > tos 0x00, ttl 64, length 25, checksum 0x5386 > fragment id 0x7307 > ICMP echo_reply checksum 0x8aff > 00:02:32:134290: ip4-lookup > fib 0 dpo-idx 5 flow hash: 0x00000000 > ICMP: 192.168.153.131 -> 192.168.153.130 > tos 0x00, ttl 64, length 25, checksum 0x5386 > fragment id 0x7307 > ICMP echo_reply checksum 0x8aff > 00:02:32:134349: ip4-local > ICMP: 192.168.153.131 -> 192.168.153.130 > tos 0x00, ttl 64, length 25, checksum 0x5386 > fragment id 0x7307 > ICMP echo_reply checksum 0x8aff > 00:02:32:134413: ip4-icmp-input > ICMP: 192.168.153.131 -> 192.168.153.130 > tos 0x00, ttl 64, length 25, checksum 0x5386 > fragment id 0x7307 > ICMP echo_reply checksum 0x8aff > 00:02:32:134433: ip4-icmp-echo-reply > ICMP echo id 29952 seq 0 (unknown) > 00:02:32:135147: error-punt > ip4-icmp-input: unknown type > > I know the only way to check the mac on interface "show hardware",how > could I check the " underlying device"? > > Fib entry display 17.04 not exactly correct compared to fib entry > 17.01 : > 17.04: > 192.168.153.131/32 > unicast-ip4-chain > [@0]: dpo-load-balance: [index:10 buckets:1 uRPF:9 to:[600:22840] > via:[205:9430]] > [0] [@5]: ipv4 via 192.168.153.131 host-eth1: > 000c298fad61000c293129ae0800 > > 17.01(not the same device): > 192.168.190.138/32 > unicast-ip4-chain > [@0]: dpo-load-balance: [index:16 buckets:1 uRPF:15 to:[9:756]] > [0] [@5]: ipv4 via 192.168.190.138 host-eth8: IP4: > 00:0c:29:b7:19:20 -> 00:0c:29:57:8f:fa > > Will this change affect my test results? > > > > Thanks, > > xyxue > > > > *From:* Damjan Marion <mailto:dmarion.li...@gmail.com> > > *Date:* 2017-05-16 22:27 > > *To:* 薛欣颖 <mailto:xy...@fiberhome.com> > > *CC:* vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>; Dave > Barach <mailto:dbar...@cisco.com> > > *Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] Failed to ping between two VPP > > > > On 16 May 2017, at 13:32, Dave Barach (dbarach) > <dbar...@cisco.com <mailto:dbar...@cisco.com>> wrote: > > > > Copying vpp-dev [and Neale Ranns AKA Dr. Fib...] > > > > Thanks… Dave > > > > *From:* 薛欣颖 [mailto:xy...@fiberhome.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 16, 2017 2:16 AM > *To:* Dave Barach (dbarach) <dbar...@cisco.com > <mailto:dbar...@cisco.com>> > *Subject:* Failed to ping between two VPP > > > > Hi Dave, > > > > When I use stable 17.04,there is something wrong when I > ping vpp2 from vpp1,that is my configuration: > > > > vpp1: > > creat host-interface name eth1 > set interface state host-eth1 up > set interface ip addr host-eth1 192.168.153.130/24 > set interface mac addr host-eth1 00:0c:29:31:29:ae > > vpp2: > > creat host-interface name eth1 > set interface state host-eth1 up > set interface ip addr host-eth1 192.168.153.131/24 > set interface mac addr host-eth1 00:0c:29:8f:ad:61 > > > > > then I " ping 192.168.153.131 "from vpp1,and "ping > 192.168.153.130" from VPP2 > > > > the packet trace: > > 01:20:19:315340: af-packet-input > af_packet: hw_if_index 2 next-index 4 > tpacket2_hdr: > status 0x20000001 len 60 snaplen 60 mac 66 net 80 > sec 0x59196685 nsec 0x18dd5a37 vlan 0 > 01:20:19:315391: ethernet-input > IP4: 00:0c:29:31:29:b8 -> 00:0c:29:8f:ad:6b > 01:20:19:315411: ip4-input > ICMP: 192.168.190.134 -> 192.168.190.136 > tos 0x00, ttl 64, length 25, checksum 0x5a2b > fragment id 0x2259 > > > > Are you sure that this trace belongs to your pings? > > Both MAC and IP address is different than one you configured…. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > vpp-dev mailing list > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev >
ping.cap
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
