Hi Neale, Yes, 10.1.1.1 is a direct attached route, but it does not have the implicit null explicitly configured. Is it mandatory?
Thanks, -nagp On Friday, June 9, 2017, Neale Ranns (nranns) <nra...@cisco.com> wrote: > > > Hi nagp, > > > > That’s the correct way to do it. > > > > Does 10.1.1.1 in table 0 have out-labels? It needs then in order to be a > resolution target for a labelled recursive. Implicit-null is the expected > out-label if 10.1.1.1 is directly attached. > > > > Regards, > > Neale > > > > > > *From: *<vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io');>> on behalf > of Nagaprabhanjan Bellari <nagp.li...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','nagp.li...@gmail.com');>> > *Date: *Friday, 9 June 2017 at 14:30 > *To: *vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','vpp-dev@lists.fd.io');>> > *Subject: *[SUSPICIOUS] [vpp-dev] Is this a valid route? > > > > Hi, > > I am trying to add the following route in VPP, but it is only getting a > drop-dpo in "show ip fib": > > "ip route add table 2 4.4.4.4/32 > <http://secure-web.cisco.com/13XjmUsXfAcVtsFEheLw8wZ39WD3SNgxlyOe1tfZRwNTnTbkat8sXvJM9NqiNJ7ni8fykpKNE64Y-WCIiGt18MHoHCe6qJJ2zVVOQTwvKzsE5bka2lbn4yWUh_g-DKxcQb37bKeg7LaUht6WWe6PXPxfi3izIvHWmeL-AsAMu_pXDNd3S6Zqp7HeUDC2MIfLzq9Iiit12gTZAcoQQRTrm4WJcovPN8p1Vlydsjl_-cV5v_rlJYp-WqyO9nAeGjiG5LrdDwbLPa5omQ0dgZlDIu2wCTTb9hjsivxpL_q3uhCKWHmQXEdB2eL2S-ODk5zn9/http%3A%2F%2F4.4.4.4%2F32> > via 10.1.1.1 next-hop-table 0 out-label 300" > > I am trying to add 4.4.4.4/32 > <http://secure-web.cisco.com/13XjmUsXfAcVtsFEheLw8wZ39WD3SNgxlyOe1tfZRwNTnTbkat8sXvJM9NqiNJ7ni8fykpKNE64Y-WCIiGt18MHoHCe6qJJ2zVVOQTwvKzsE5bka2lbn4yWUh_g-DKxcQb37bKeg7LaUht6WWe6PXPxfi3izIvHWmeL-AsAMu_pXDNd3S6Zqp7HeUDC2MIfLzq9Iiit12gTZAcoQQRTrm4WJcovPN8p1Vlydsjl_-cV5v_rlJYp-WqyO9nAeGjiG5LrdDwbLPa5omQ0dgZlDIu2wCTTb9hjsivxpL_q3uhCKWHmQXEdB2eL2S-ODk5zn9/http%3A%2F%2F4.4.4.4%2F32> > in table 2 but its nexthop, 10.1.1.1, has to be resolved in table 0 and the > packet has to be strapped a label while going out (the typical l3vpn case) > > Can you please tell me if this is the right way to do so? > > Thanks, > > -nagp > >
_______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
