Hi, guys
Last week I did some performance test on VPP with Spirent testcenter. Below I 
give two groups of running data in two different situation using the 'show run' 
command . Inboth situationVPP drop packets ( from the 'rx-miss' output in 'show 
int' command). In my opinion, when VPP begins to drop packets, the value of 
Vectors/Call should be high. So I think situation 1 is easy to understand. But 
the running data of situation 2 make me confused because Vectors/Call is still 
very low.
Can anyone explains why and what's the relationship between VPP performance and 
average vectors per node?
--------------------------------------------------------situation 
1-------------------------------------------------------------------
Thread 1 vpp_wk_0 (lcore 1)
Time 225.3, average vectors/node 255.99, last 128 main loops 0.00 per node 0.00
  vector rates in 2.2244e6, out 2.2242e6, drop 2.0019e2, punt 0.0000e0
             Name                 State         Calls          Vectors        
Suspends         Clocks       Vectors/Call 
TenGigabitEthernet6/0/1-output   active            1957460       501107294      
         0          8.67e0          255.99
TenGigabitEthernet6/0/1-tx       active            1957460       501107294      
         0          1.08e2          255.99
dpdk-input                       polling        1227897513       501152389      
         0          4.65e2             .41
error-drop                       active                182           45103      
         0          4.15e1          247.82
ip4-arp                          active                138           34616      
         0          3.43e1          250.84
ip4-drop                         active                 44           10487      
         0          8.91e0          238.34
ip4-input-no-checksum            active            1957630       501152389      
         0          3.77e1          255.99
ip4-lookup                       active            1957630       501152389      
         0          2.98e1          255.99
ip4-mimic-classify               active            1957630       501152389      
         0          2.13e2          255.99
ip4-rewrite                      active            1957452       501107286      
         0          2.96e1          255.99
lookup-ip4-src                   active            1957630       501152389      
         0          5.07e1          255.99
snat-in2out-fast                 active            1957630       501152389      
         0          2.56e2          255.99

--------------------------------------------------------situation 
2-------------------------------------------------------------------
Thread 2 vpp_wk_1 (lcore 2)
Time 1024.5, average vectors/node 8.57, last 128 main loops 0.00 per node 0.00
  vector rates in 1.2209e6, out 1.2209e6, drop 0.0000e0, punt 0.0000e0
             Name                 State         Calls          Vectors        
Suspends         Clocks       Vectors/Call 
TenGigabitEthernet6/0/0-output   active          145982828      1250882588      
         0          2.93e1            8.57
TenGigabitEthernet6/0/0-tx       active          145982828      1250882588      
         0          1.37e2            8.57
dpdk-input                       polling        9106470948      1250882588      
         0          1.31e3             .14
ip4-input-no-checksum            active          145982828      1250882588      
         0          7.39e1            8.57
ip4-lookup                       active          145982828      1250882588      
         0          7.56e1            8.57
ip4-mimic-classify               active          145982828      1250882588      
         0          1.31e2            8.57
ip4-rewrite                      active          145982828      1250882588      
         0          6.33e1            8.57
snat-out2in-fast                 active          145982828      1250882588      
         0          4.50e1            8.57





 
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Reply via email to