well looking at the change it definitely suggests to be a bug fix.

we are currently using 1707 builds, and dont have plan to move to newer release right now, so would prefer a merge to 1707.

Regards,
Prabhjot

Quoting "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
<nra...@cisco.com>:

With my release manager hat on …
Do we consider support for VLAN tags on an AF packet interface a bug fix (to be back ported) or a new feature (available from 17.10 onwards)?

/neale

-----Original Message-----
From: "prabh...@techtrueup.com" <prabh...@techtrueup.com>
Date: Thursday, 28 September 2017 at 13:07
To: "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com>
Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "John Lo (loj)" <l...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, Akshaya Nadahalli <aksh...@rtbrick.com>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces

    yes i verified it on stable/1707 itself.

    Regards,
    Prabhjot

    Quoting "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com>:

    > See https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8590. The patch cherry-picked easily
    > to stable/1707.
    >
    > Assuming that the cherry-pick patch validates - and that it solves
    > your problem - it will be up to Neale [as the 17.07 release manager]
    > whether to merge it or not.
    >
    > Please let us know whether the cherry-pick patch works for you.
    >
    > Thanks… Dave
    >
    > From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io
    > [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Prabhjot Singh Sethi
    > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 3:27 PM
    > To: Akshaya Nadahalli <aksh...@rtbrick.com>; Prabhjot Singh Sethi
    > <prabh...@techtrueup.com>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; John Lo (loj)
    > <l...@cisco.com>
    > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces
    >
    > yes it works perfectly fine with this patch.
    > i hope this will be pushed to 17.07 branch as well.
    >
    > Thanks for the help :)
    >
    > Regards,
    > Prabhjot
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From:
    > "Akshaya Nadahalli" <aksh...@rtbrick.com<mailto:aksh...@rtbrick.com>>
    >
    > To:
    > "Prabhjot Singh Sethi"
    > <prabh...@techtrueup.com<mailto:prabh...@techtrueup.com>>,
    > <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>, "John Lo"
    > <l...@cisco.com<mailto:l...@cisco.com>>
    > Cc:
    >
    > Sent:
    > Thu, 28 Sep 2017 19:18:50 +0530
    > Subject:
    > Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces
    >
    >
    > Hi Prabhjot,
    >
    >
    >
    > Can you pls try with below patch and see if it helps:
    >
    > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8435/
    >
    >
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > Akshaya N
    >
    > On Thursday 28 September 2017 03:45 PM, Prabhjot Singh Sethi wrote:
    > trying again with more appropriate subject
    >
    > Can some one please help if i am missing any thing over here ?
    >
    > As mentioned earlier, i have interface host-eth10 and sub interface
    > host-eth10.10 (create sub host-eth10 10)
    > host-eth10 is associated to bridge domain 2 and sub interface is
    > associated to bridge domain 3
    > when VPP receives tagged packet with vlan 10 it still associates it
    > to bd 2 and not bd 3
    >
    > Note: if i don't associate any bd with base interface it just drops
    > the packet with some error.
    >
    > Regards,
    > Prabhjot
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > vpp-dev mailing list
    > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
    > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
    >
    > --
    > Regards,
    > Akshaya N


_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Reply via email to