Klement,

I did notice it and I pointed that out in my previous email too.
Do you think that's caused by my patch?


Cheers,
Marco

On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 10:38 +0000, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> Did you notice this issue?
> 
> 08:54:52 Removing rpm/SRPMS/
> 08:54:52 Removing rpm/tmp/
> 08:54:52 make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-centos7/dpdk'
> 08:54:52 sudo rpm -Uih vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp1.x86_64.rpm
> 08:54:53 ########################################
> 08:54:53      package vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp2.x86_64 (which is newer
> than vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp1.x86_64) is already installed
> 08:54:53 make[1]: *** [install-rpm] Error 2
> 08:54:53 make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-centos7/dpdk'
> 08:54:53 make: *** [dpdk-install-dev] Error 2
> 08:54:53 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
> 
> Thanks,
> Klement
> 
> Quoting Marco Varlese (2017-10-11 12:28:48)
> > Hi Jan,
> > 
> > Thanks for pointing to the correct TEST failure.
> > However, what I'd like to mention is that it's literally impossible to get a
> > build/run through for the past couple of days. 
> > I am not sure if it's just me being unlucky but none of the "-1 Verified" I
> > get
> > are due to the patch I submit... :(
> > Please, if you have 2 spare mins, take a look at this patch https://gerrit.f
> > d.io
> > /r/#/c/8733/ and see how many "recheck" I have and all failed.
> > 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Marco
> > 
> > On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 10:15 +0000, Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON
> > TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> > > Hello Marco,
> > > 
> > > Regarding failure of vpp-csit-verify-virl-master job - the issue is not
> > > the TC
> > > mentioned by you below. "TC02: DUT reports packet flow for traffic with
> > > local
> > > destination address" is also marked as non-critical as it is expected to
> > > fail
> > > now. You can see it in the console log too:
> > > 
> > > 08:00:53 TC02: DUT reports packet flow for traffic with local destination
> > > address :: [Top] TG-DUT1-DUT2-TG. [Cfg] On DUT1 configure I... | FAIL |
> > > 08:00:53 Traffic script execution failed
> > > 08:00:53 ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 08:01:22 TC03: DUT reports packet flow for traffic with remote destination
> > > address :: [Top] TG-DUT1-DUT2-TG. [Cfg] On DUT1 configure ... | PASS |
> > > 08:01:22 ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 08:01:22 Tests.Vpp.Func.Telemetry.Eth2P-Ethip6-Ip6Base-Ip6Ipfixbase-Func
> > > ::
> > > *IPFIX ipv6 test cases*                                      | PASS |
> > > 08:01:22 0 critical tests, 0 passed, 0 failed
> > > 08:01:22 3 tests total, 2 passed, 1 failed
> > > 
> > > => there is no critical test failure (only critical tests can block the
> > > verification)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The failed test is " Eth2P-Ethip6-Ip6Base-Ipolicemarkbase-Func .TC01: VPP
> > > policer 2R3C Color-aware marks packet":
> > > 
> > > 08:07:42 TC01: VPP policer 2R3C Color-aware marks packet :: [Top]
> > > TG=DUT1.                                                             
> > > [ WARN ] Tests.Vpp.Func.Ip6.Eth2P-Ethip6-Ip6Base-Ipolicemarkbase-Func -
> > > TC01:
> > > VPP policer 2R3C Color-aware marks packet 
> > > 08:07:42 The VPP PIDs are not equal!
> > > 08:07:42 Test Setup VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9591, '10.30.52.215': 6792}
> > > 08:07:42 Test Teardown VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9863, '10.30.52.215':
> > > 6792}
> > > 08:07:42 Tests.Vpp.Func.Ip6.Eth2P-Ethip6-Ip6Base-Ipolicemarkbase-Func -
> > > TC01:
> > > VPP policer 2R3C Color-aware marks packet 
> > > 08:07:42 The VPP PIDs are not equal!
> > > 08:07:42 Test Setup VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9591, '10.30.52.215': 6792}
> > > 08:07:42 Test Teardown VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9863, '10.30.52.215':
> > > 6792}
> > > 08:07:42 | FAIL |
> > > 08:07:42 Teardown failed:
> > > 08:07:42 SSHTimeout: Timeout exception.
> > > 08:07:42 Current contents of stdout buffer: 
> > > 08:07:42 Current contents of stderr buffer:
> > > 
> > > It seems that there was VPP restart during execution of this test.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Jan
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Marco Varlese [mailto:marco.varl...@suse.com] 
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 10:49
> > > To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <jgelety@cisc
> > > o.co
> > > m>; Ed Kern (ejk) <e...@cisco.com>
> > > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; csit-...@lists.fd.io
> > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing
> > > 
> > > Today I can't get a build +1 Verified.
> > > 
> > > Different sort of errors and completely random...
> > > 
> > > https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-centos7/7520/console
> > > 07:11:39 make[2]: Leaving directory `/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
> > > centos7/dpdk'
> > > 07:11:39 sudo rpm -Uih vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp1.x86_64.rpm
> > > 07:11:39 ########################################
> > > 07:11:39      package vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp2.x86_64 (which is newer
> > > than
> > > vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp1.x86_64) is already installed
> > > 07:11:39 make[1]: *** [install-rpm] Error 2
> > > 07:11:39 make[1]: Leaving directory `/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
> > > centos7/dpdk'
> > > 07:11:39 make: *** [dpdk-install-dev] Error 2
> > > 07:11:39 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
> > > 
> > > https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/7533/console
> > > 08:29:44 08:00:53 TC02: DUT reports packet flow for traffic with local
> > > destination address :: [Top] TG-DUT1-DUT2-TG. [Cfg] On DUT1 configure I...
> > > |
> > > FAIL |
> > > 08:29:44 08:00:53 Traffic script execution failed
> > > 08:29:44
> > > ==========================================================================
> > > ====
> > > ==
> > > 08:29:44 Final result of all test
> > > loops:                                                                    
> > >     
> > >   
> > >                        | FAIL |
> > > 08:29:44 1 critical test has failed.
> > > 08:29:44
> > > ==========================================================================
> > > ====
> > > ==
> > > 
> > > 
> > > - Marco
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 07:26 +0000, Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON
> > > TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> > > > Hello Marco,
> > > > 
> > > > I had a look on the test case log 
> > > > (https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-v
> > > > irl-master/7480/robot/report/log.html) - it's always the best action 
> > > > you can do to check what test case really caused the failure as there 
> > > > are some tests expected to fail because of non-fixed issues in VPP - 
> > > > and failed test is
> > > > 
> > > > TEST TC01: Route IPv4 packet through LISP with Bridge Domain setup.
> > > > 
> > > > Where no running VPP was detected (no VPP pid returned) during the 
> > > > test case setup phase.
> > > > 
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Jan
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Marco Varlese [mailto:marco.varl...@suse.com]
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 09:04
> > > > To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) 
> > > > <jgel...@cisco.co
> > > > m>; Ed Kern (ejk) <e...@cisco.com>
> > > > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; csit-...@lists.fd.io
> > > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing
> > > > 
> > > > Please, take a look at this logs:
> > > > 
> > > > https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/7480/console
> > > > 
> > > > After Ed and yourself mentioned it... maybe the cause of the failure 
> > > > is linked to this failure instead?
> > > > 14:32:52 14:11:12 Tests.Vpp.Func.Ip4 Tunnels.Lisp.Eth2P-Ethip4Lisp- 
> > > > L2Bdbasemaclrn-Func :: *ip4-lispgpe-ip4 encapsulation test
> > > > cases*              |
> > > > FAIL |
> > > > 14:32:52 14:11:12 1 critical test, 0 passed, 1 failed
> > > > 14:32:52 14:11:12 1 test total, 0 passed, 1 failed
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Marco
> > > > 
> > > > On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 15:49 +0000, Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON 
> > > > TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> > > > > + csit-dev
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hello Marco,
> > > > > 
> > > > > The mentioned test case is not responsible for -1 in verification as 
> > > > > this test case is marked as non-critical. Please, provide links to 
> > > > > affected jobs to find which TC is really failing.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Jan
> > > > > 
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io 
> > > > > [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io]
> > > > > On Behalf Of Ed Kern (ejk)
> > > > > Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 17:07
> > > > > To: Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com>
> > > > > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > > > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing
> > > > > 
> > > > > could you throw me some example jobs?
> > > > > 
> > > > > thanks,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Ed
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > On Oct 6, 2017, at 8:54 AM, Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I have seen this many times these days...
> > > > > > I wonder if it's a infra hiccup or something is really broken?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The "recheck" is becoming the norm to get a clean +1 Verified... 
> > > > > > :(
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 14:32:52 14:00:32 TC04: VPP doesn't send DHCPv4 REQUEST after 
> > > > > > OFFER with wrong
> > > > > > XID :: Configure DHCPv4 client on interface to TG. If server       |
> > > > > > FAIL
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 14:32:52 14:00:32 Expected error 'DHCP REQUEST Rx timeout' but got 
> > > > > > 'Traffic script execution failed'.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Marco
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > vpp-dev mailing list
> > > > > > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > > > > > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
> > > > > 
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > vpp-dev mailing list
> > > > > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > > > > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
> > > > > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > vpp-dev mailing list
> > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
  • [vpp-dev] Tes... Marco Varlese
    • Re: [vpp... Ed Kern (ejk)
      • Re: ... Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
        • ... Marco Varlese
          • ... Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
            • ... Marco Varlese
              • ... Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
                • ... Marco Varlese
                • ... Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
                • ... Marco Varlese
                • ... Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
                • ... Dave Wallace

Reply via email to