I apologize, this was meant to be a private communication.

Sorry for spamming the list.
-daw-

On 01/26/2018 11:01 AM, Dave Wallace wrote:
Jan,

It appears that we may have the opportunity for some cross-project collaboration here (or collateral damage). Peter has kicking the tires on VCL/LD_PRELOAD + host stack for a while now, but has yet to identify his use case.

Do you know what Peter is working on and where it fits into the overall priority list?

Thanks,
-daw-

On 01/26/2018 04:54 AM, Peter Palmár wrote:
Hi,

we have recently tested the VPP TCP stack/VCL-LDPRELOAD library with C++ gRPC (https://grpc.io/) and reported two bugs:
https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1089
https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1101

I would like to ask whether the way how the VCL-LDPRELOAD library is being developed is the same, i.e., it's use-case driven and a full POSIX replacement via LDPRELOAD remains out of scope.

If so, does that mean that in order for the VPP TCP stack to become functional with gRPC, we can report bugs only, or, if appropriate, help to fix them?

Are you not going to be focused on the C++ gRPC by yourselves in the near feature?

Regards,
Peter



_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev


_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Reply via email to