> Is that drop visible in CSIT trending graphs? Mostly not, apparently it depends (at least) on NIC (x520 is not affected) and on number of CPU cores for workers (visible for 4).
The biggest drop I see is here [0]. Vratko. [0] https://docs.fd.io/csit/master/trending/trending/l2-3n-hsw-xl710-64b-base-scale.html#t4c From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> On Behalf Of Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io Sent: Thursday, 2018-September-27 14:24 To: Zhang Yuwei <yuwei1.zh...@intel.com> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Master branch l2bd test perf dop -- Damjan On 27 Sep 2018, at 05:02, Zhang Yuwei <yuwei1.zh...@intel.com<mailto:yuwei1.zh...@intel.com>> wrote: Hi All, In our recent test, I found a performance drop in master branch. I execute the l2bd test case in a 2.5GHZ CPU and found almost 35% drop compared to 18.07 release. My test is set two NIC ports to a same bridge domain and send traffic to test the l2 forward performance. I found in the master branch, l2flood function consume much more CPU cycles than 18.07 which means any test use the l2flood function will also have a performance drop. Can anybody kindly help to check this issue? Thanks a lot. Regards, Yuwei Is that drop visible in CSIT trending graphs?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10745): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10745 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/26289209/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
