That's as it is now. A rework of the code is planned, no ETA yet... Quoting mik...@yeah.net (2018-12-12 02:05:40) > W...What??? So the only way to make ip reassembly working correctly is to > keep one or more interfaces attached to a single worker thread? > That does not sound efficient ...... > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > mik...@yeah.net > > > From: [1]Klement Sekera > Date: 2018-12-11 20:39 > To: [2]Mikado; [3]vpp-dev > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Any tricks in IP reassembly ? > Hi Mikado, > > if the fragments get split between multiple workers, then eventually > they'll get dropped after timing out ... > > Regards, > Klement > > Quoting Mikado (2018-12-11 08:52:28) > > Hi, > > > > I have noticed that “ip4-reassembly-feature” node only > > reassembles packets stored in the local pool of each thread. But it > seems > > not right if a group of fragment packages is handled by different > worker > > thread. So is there any tricks in VPP forcing the fragment > packages in > > the same group dispatched to the same thread ? Or is it a bug ? > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Mikado > > References > > Visible links > 1. mailto:ksek...@cisco.com > 2. mailto:mik...@yeah.net > 3. mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11576): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11576 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28718629/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
