Thanks for bringing that patch to my attention, I didn't use it (I believe it hadn't been merged yet). A quick re-test shows that the failure is gone - thanks!
Juraj -----Original Message----- From: Klement Sekera [mailto:ksek...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 1:26 PM To: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.lin...@pantheon.tech> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Sirshak Das <sirshak....@arm.com>; Lijian Zhang (Arm Technology China) <lijian.zh...@arm.com>; Stanislav Chlebec <stanislav.chle...@pantheon.tech> Subject: Re: Ipv4 random reassembly failure on x86 and ARM Is this with https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/16548/ merged? Quoting Juraj Linkeš (2018-12-20 12:09:12) > Hi Klement and vpp-dev, > > > > [1]https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1522 fixed the issue with an assert we've > been seeing with random reassembly, however, there's still some other > failure in that test: [2]https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1475 > > > > It seems that not all fragments are sent properly. The run documented in > Jira shows only 3089 fragments out of 5953 being sent and the test only > sees 39 out of 257 packets received. > > > > Could you or anyone from vpp-dev who's more familiar with the feature/code > advise on how to debug this further? > > > > I was able to reproduce this on my local x86 Bionic and Xenial VMs as well > as our Cavium ThunderX machines (the ones we also use in CI). I'd love to > see whether anyone else can also reproduce it on an x86 machine outside of > CI (where the failure doesn't happen). > > > > Thanks, > > Juraj > > References > > Visible links > 1. https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1522 > 2. https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1475
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11735): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11735 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28810299/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
