Hey, sorry to pester folks... Anyone have any insight here for us? Thanks, jdl
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 8:12 AM Jon Loeliger <[email protected]> wrote: > Good Morning, > > We are working on some MAP-E and MAP-T testing, and we have > a few questions. Some of the existing VPP documentation about > MAP-E and MAP-T is a bit loose. > > Should the use of a pre-resolved forwarding address be applicable > to both MAP-E and MAP-T? Or is that only a MAP-E thing? Specifically, > we see in the test/test_map.py test that it is only tested in the MAP-E > case. > Is it missing from the MAP-T tests due to oversight, or is that > technically correct? > > The MAP-T test also "enables map" on both interfaces in that same file. > Is it required to do so? For only MAP-T? > > Finally, there is no test that introduces a rule. I feel like I read > somewhere > that MAP-T required at least one rule? Or is some combination of PSID > and EA bits sufficient alone? > > Thanks, > jdl > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12788): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12788 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31018611/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
