Hi Jon, Apologies for the delay. Is this what you’re after : https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/23808
/neale From: <[email protected]> on behalf of "Jon Loeliger via Lists.Fd.Io" <[email protected]> Reply to: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Thursday 7 November 2019 at 06:28 To: vpp-dev <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [vpp-dev] FIB Route Sources Neale, We have a use case where we would like to be able to determine a more-fine-grained reason for introducing routes into the FIBs. All the routes we introduce will come via some API call, but on behalf of different sources. Specifically, they will come from a user-supplied static route, different routing protocols (BGP, OSPF, etc). What would you say to adding a few more enum entries into the fib_source_t type? We could then modify the fib_api_route_add_del() to allow the API to state which source should be used rather than just "API". Thoughts? jdl
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#14807): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/14807 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/44489479/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
