Is there a way to keep ipsecX naming, use of ipipX for ipsec tunnels seems to be confusing for many people...
> On 7 May 2020, at 14:15, Neale Ranns via lists.fd.io > <nranns=cisco....@lists.fd.io> wrote: > > > Hi Chris, > > They were replaced by ipip interfaces protected by SAs: > https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/IPSec#Tunnel_Mode > <https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/IPSec#Tunnel_Mode> > > the tunnel always adds encap. You can configure your SA to add additional > encap if you want. > > /neale > > > From: <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> on behalf of > Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org <mailto:cho...@chopps.org>> > Date: Wednesday 6 May 2020 at 14:32 > To: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> > Cc: Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org <mailto:cho...@chopps.org>> > Subject: [vpp-dev] IPsec tunnel interfaces? > > Hi, vpp-dev, > > Post 19.08 seems to have removed IPsec logical interfaces. > > One cannot always use transport mode IPsec. > > How can I get the efficiency of route based (FIB) IPsec w/o transport mode? > Adding superfluous encapsulations (wasting bandwidth) to replace this > (seemingly lost, hope not) functionality is not an option. > > Thanks, > Chris. >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#16266): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/16266 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/74027328/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
