Hi Chris,
I suspect it would be good to align on the new bond nomenclature coming from
other projects. DPDK and Linux are probably starting points we should consider
IMO.
Jerome
Le 14/07/2020 18:45, « t...@lists.fd.io au nom de Chris Luke »
<t...@lists.fd.io au nom de chris_l...@comcast.com> a écrit :
It is subjective and contextualized. But in this case, if making the effort
to correct a wrong, why stop half way?
Chris.
-----Original Message-----
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> On Behalf Of Jerome Tollet
via lists.fd.io
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 12:37
To: Steven Luong (sluong) <slu...@cisco.com>; Dave Barach (dbarach)
<dbar...@cisco.com>; Kinsella, Ray <m...@ashroe.eu>; Stephen Hemminger
<step...@networkplumber.org>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; t...@lists.fd.io; Ed
Warnicke (eaw) <e...@cisco.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [vpp-dev] Replacing master/slave nomenclature
Hi Steven,
Please note that per this proposition,
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/4/229__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!QdLdxm4rtZW-mFe5jt_qzEpx-_X2KWnqvjyEl-7Py41jsEV7FrnEw0lTNcF8LdfUzQ$
, slave must be avoided but master can be kept.
Maybe master/member or master/secondary could be options too.
Jerome
Le 14/07/2020 18:32, « vpp-dev@lists.fd.io au nom de steven luong via
lists.fd.io » <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io au nom de sluong=cisco....@lists.fd.io> a
écrit :
I am in the process of pushing a patch to replace master/slave with
aggregator/member for the bonding.
Steven
On 7/13/20, 4:44 AM, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Dave Barach via
lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of dbarach=cisco....@lists.fd.io>
wrote:
+1, especially since our next release will be supported for a year,
and API name changes are involved...
-----Original Message-----
From: Kinsella, Ray <m...@ashroe.eu>
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 6:01 AM
To: Dave Barach (dbarach) <dbar...@cisco.com>; Stephen Hemminger
<step...@networkplumber.org>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; t...@lists.fd.io; Ed
Warnicke (eaw) <e...@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Replacing master/slave nomenclature
Hi Stephen,
I agree, I don't think we should ignore this.
Ed - I suggest we table a discussion at the next FD.io TSC?
Ray K
On 09/07/2020 17:05, Dave Barach via lists.fd.io wrote:
> Looping in the technical steering committee...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> On Behalf Of
Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 7:02 PM
> To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Subject: [vpp-dev] Replacing master/slave nomenclature
>
> Is the VPP project addressing the use of master/slave
nomenclature in the code base, documentation and CLI? We are doing this for
DPDK and it would be good if the replacement wording used in DPDK matched the
wording used in FD.io projects.
>
> Particularly problematic is the use of master/slave in bonding.
> This seems to be a leftover from Linux, since none of the
commercial products use that terminology and it is not present in 802.1AX
standard.
>
> The IEEE and IETF are doing an across the board look at these
terms in standards.
>
>
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#16955): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/16955
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/75503531/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
