Thank you for the response Balaji. I have noticed VPP crashes when I configure an ABF on the interface that already has an non-abf ACL attached to the interface. And when I don't have non-abf ACL, then I am able to install ABF rule. Hence was wondering if it's a misconfiguration to have both ABF and non-abf ACL on the same interface. I agree, in any case, it should not result in a crash.
thanks Venkat On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:59 AM Balaji Venkatraman via lists.fd.io <balajiv= [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Venkat, > > > > Underlying the ABF is another ACL. When we attach an ABF to the interface, > the ACL it inherits gets applied to the interface. Not sure if another ACL > independent of the above can be attached to the same interface. But, in any > case, it should not crash 😊 > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Balaji. > > > > > > *From: *<[email protected]> on behalf of "[email protected]" < > [email protected]> > *Date: *Friday, August 7, 2020 at 9:36 AM > *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Subject: *[vpp-dev] ABF and ACL co-existence on an Interface > > > > Hello, > Experimenting ABF in VPP. Had a question regarding the co-existence of ABF > and ACL on an interface. > Seems like we can either attach ABF or ACL to an interface and not both. > Is this the behavior or am I missing anything? > When I try to install ABF rule on an interface that already has ACL > attached, I see vpp resulting in a crash. > Please confirm. > thanks > Venkat > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#17168): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/17168 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/76052836/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
