> I’m not very familiar with DPDK AF_XDP pmd, but my guess is that if it is > not working, likely it is because it needs to do something special with > buffer memory (i.e. register regions trough AFXDP APIs) and that memory is > handled by VPP.
Damjan is correct, we rely on AF_XDP unaligned memory support, I do not know whether DPDK initializes it or not. Did you try to use AF_XDP DPDK PMD and is it failing? ben > > On 18.05.2021., at 11:25, Catalin Vasile <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > So shouldn't this hack for also using the vpp buffer manager be > generally usable with all PMDs? > > From: Damjan Marion <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 1:17 > > To: Catalin Vasile <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] [DPDK] AF_XDP PMD > > > > > > No, dpdk PMDs are also using vpp buffer manager, we are cheating a bit > by registering fake mempool. > > > > — > > Damjan > > > > > On 17.05.2021., at 23:40, Catalin Vasile <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > �쏜㷃�쏜㷃�쏜㋢鹋ᢢ燨꽹ꥥ駫ⱪެ뇩譡諈⮢觬㽅죩瞵皆�돿쭬緘ꣾꚗ庿咽닆ꁻﵽ�貺 > 힓蘫Ꭲ颜蛛榳￥請汽�﹫翳漷㛿껹蚮让㬉�響痫ﺣ깘겶쟝誅➲犸魺᭭ꛏﾖ⬭뇷抣뺚嵺￮黋魶暫誉 > 쨦�쏜㷃�쏜㷃�쏜 > > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#19397): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/19397 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/82836782/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
