Hi Govind, > 1. Would there be any suggestions that can achieve a lower packet drop > rate under a high binary-API call rate?
The strategy has been to change the APIs functions so that they are thread-safe on an ad-hoc basis, see ip_route_add_del for example. > 2. Are there any plan in future vpp release that can improve the "locking" > of worker thread for non-thread-safe binary API call? Not that I know of. What is the usecase here? This usually concerns a small set of APIs that can be updated to be thread-safe. Best ben
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#19778): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/19778 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/84196118/21656 Mute #vpp:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/vpp Mute #binapi:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/binapi Mute #vapi:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/vapi Mute #vpp-dev:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/vpp-dev Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
