I’d suggest a pipe, each end can be in a different VRF. See src/scripts/vnet/ipsec for a config example.
/neale From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> on behalf of Benoit Ganne (bganne) via lists.fd.io <bganne=cisco....@lists.fd.io> Date: Thursday, 5 January 2023 at 00:18 To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] veth alternative in VPP > Hi, I am looking for veth pair alternative in VPP. I want to pass traffics > between two VRFs and I want them to be processed as input packets to an > interface( to use NAT or other ip features), so route leakage is not gonna > help. Also, since I'm using one instance of VPP with multiple VRFs, using > memifs are not viable. Are there any methods in VPP to achieve the same > goal? You can use loopback or pipe interfaces for this. Best ben
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22415): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/22415 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/96048462/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/leave/1480452/21656/631435203/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
