Hi Herbert, On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 15:11:43 +0100 Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 02:17:24PM +0100, Fritz Kron wrote: > > Hello, > > Hi Fritz! > > > We just got the v1.21 patched kernel up (debian) and are > > very interested in diffs to get the 0.29 tools running. > > > > BTW. ? whats about the bugs in V1.2 Jonathan Sambrook wrote > > patches for, is v1.21 realy stable or is it just alot of > > work compiling and installing the stuff for crashing the server? > > 1.20/21 does contain a bugfix Jonathan and I did, it > does not contain the sem replacement Jonathan posted > yesterday ;) that means 1.21 should work quite stable and will not be outdated in some weeks? > > > What is the meaning of "STABLE" - some kind of testing versions? > > what is the meaning of "testing version"? something the > people don't even look at, because they stick to the > 'stable' releases? > > how do you think, vserver should evolve? It seems changes and releases are done a little bit too fast, which version do you suggest to use for production environment? (nameserver, customers etc) > > if 'stable' for you means that the code is bugfree, you > have to do a logical proof for it, this can be done for > 20-30 lines of code, welcome to the real world ... > > every 'bug' I'm informed of, will be fixed as soon as > possible, that's exactly what we did for vs1.21, if > you think ctx-17 is more stable, or ctx-12 or whatever, > please feel free to use that version or none at all ... > Sure there will be bugs in newly written code and after some bugfixes and testing it gets often ;) more "Stable". What are the future plans for vserver? Is there a team of developers working together making releases or will there be a lot of different releases from each developer one? You guys make good work so far, thank you! regards Fritz > best, > Herbert > > > kind regards Fritz > > > > On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:49:31 +0100 > > "Thomas Gebhardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > has anyone already made patches for making .deb files from the > > > vserver 0.29 tools? The last patch on ftp.debian.org is > > > vserver_0.26-2.diff.gz and does not apply cleanly to the > > > 0.29 sources. Some debian patches already got merged into 0.29, > > > and some other stuff has changed, so it requires some manual > > > fixes and insight to get things right. If anyone has already > > > done the hard part, I'd hesitate to do the work again :-) > > > > > > Thanks, Thomas > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Vserver mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Vserver mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver > _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
