On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:25:59PM -0500, Allen Parker wrote: [utterly important info zapped]
> > > How hard would it be to backport the freevps /proc/vservers > > > to "our" vs1.XX? > > > > hmm, for Alex (or Say) I guess, it wouldn't be too > > hard to do that, for somebody not so intimate with > > that code, such a port (I refuse to use the phrase > > 'backport' for 2.4.18-RH -> 2.4.23 ports ;) wouln't > > be that easy ... but nevertheless doable ... > > I'd say that I really like the /proc/vservers idea as > a way to control them (with faux /dev/initctl etc run > through a /proc interface on the host machine). well, have a look at vs1.3.0 or the kernel 2.6 hack, it is at least a beginning ... > With some fakies I'm sure this project could make virtuozzo > look like an overpriced piece of junk (even though it's > that already :-p) keep the ideas coming ... describe them in technicolor and we have something to talk about ... I'm all ears ;) best, Herbert > > > I think it'd be nice to be able to have these features > > > while still running a recent kernel (not 2.4.18) > > > anybody else think so too? > > > > yup, I think so too, and either the virtual network > > concept I am working on, or the next generation of > > the linux-vserver code will do such things, although > > they don't have top priority, as key can easily be > > solved by other means ... > > > > http://www.paul.sladen.org/vserver/faq/#bandwidth > > (this could also be included in vserver start/stop) > > > > HTH, > > Herbert > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Vserver mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
