On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 16:04, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > hmm, the vs0.06 version is very similar to the devel > releases, so the procfs is 'secure' by default, > which means you probably have to 'enable' some proc > entries first, before the 'current' vserver tools > will work (and probably vserver services too) > > /proc/*info and /proc/sta* are good candidates ...
ok - so where do I get vproc, or is it still necessary, or where do I find proc setup instructions in the FAQ or Wiki. (I looked. really.) > I'll do so, thanks for testing this, I really > appreciate it ... > No problem. I can't patch 1.3.6 against 2.4.24 and don't have 2.4.25-pre7 on the box, so I didn't test the x86_64 stuff. Soon. BTW - Herbert, I can't send mail directly to you - I'm blocked by your server. I know my forward and reverse dns don't match, but reverse does resolve. Thanks, Matt > > -- > > Matthew Excell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The Possibility Forge, Inc. > > > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver -- Matthew Excell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The Possibility Forge, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
