В Втр, 02.03.2004, в 22:52, Dariush Pietrzak пишет: > > > 4) IPv6 support. Zones have it, vserver does not. > > It realy need ? i see only one-two request to this feature. if i have > I don't need it. At least not this year, maybe two years from now. > I was just making a quick list of things that you get with Solaris Zones > and you can't get from vserver solutions. > > > four-five requests i add handle ipv6 protocol to my branch. > I've seen 2 or 3 requests from some french hackers on irc. > I don't really think there's a need for that right now, it's just that > would be neat thing to have, there's a natural attraction between large > pool of addresses and vservers ( it's relatively easy to get 2^16 pool of > addresses in ipv6 space, it's very hard to get even C class in ipv4 ). > It can be created with 2 layer routing tables. I create basic stuff for this and this idea can be used for work any protocol. I think same idea used in Virtuozo.
> > It easy with private disk namespace. I create it for FreeVPS. > What exactly are those 'private namespaces' in kernel context? > It gets mentioned often enough, but I still don't understand what that is. > Where can I find some relevant info? google spews some unrelated basic > stuff.. oh.. I don`t know where get info. I do analyze kernel sources - fs/namespace.c and all points where using "struct namespace". Sample for this copy_namespace and sys_pivot_root functions in fs/namespace.c. -- Alex Lyashkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PSoft _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
