-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > if you consider them too experimental (allthough i thought > > they were stable?) you could add a note next to the option > > (in kernel config) that that option is experimental... > > this is not the reason, it's just that many people do not > use quota or context quota (I'd say 80% or more), and why > should they be forced to download and apply a patch, which > is about twice as large as necessary, with the following > extended risks > > - there might be a critical bug in the quota code > - some kernel change might harm the 'old' quota code
hmm ok, thnx for the expl. i didn't know that. i was just asking because if the quota patches were included, they would be released as often as the vserver patches and for the same recent kernels. :-) but i see now, that it's wiser to separate them. - -- regards, Georges Toth -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAZzXr8pWPvwUjUA0RAj6BAKCIKgu5H7T7F3i2OQBzY6Y/lpFbCQCgxAnB YXBTDPE7VB0rau2gl8Dj5Bo= =iAjK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
