On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 03:38:48PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Hi Bjoern, > > > No, the most recent 2.6 patch is pre10. Patches, deltas and various > > other stuff can be found here: > > http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/ > > Ahh, thanks, those are better :-) Does anyone know why these aren't linked > to by the patches page at > [http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/e_patches/overview/]?
because I'm lazy, like every developer ;) > > I guess you're using the stable tools, or at least a legacy > > configuration, replace -H with -HS in the ULIMIT line. This is a general > > kernel change introduced somewhere around 2.4.24 IIRC. > > Wow, nice of them to break binary compatibility in a stable kernel release > :-) Still, I suppose it's not the first time. actually it was called a bug-fix ... 8-) > > Proc-entries are by default hidden in devel/exper. patches, more > > information can be found here: > > http://www.linux-vserver.org/index.php?page=Proc-Security > > http://archives.linux-vserver.org/200401/0125.html > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg06552.html > > This "feature" is still giving me problems, like an inability to shut down > vservers once they're started. I've had to turn it off for now. > > > Hmm... Don't know, maybe you're not using a static context? Basic > > kernel/tools check script is located here: > > Seems to have been related to the old patch, the newer versions > (1.9.0-pre9 and later) don't seem to have this problem > > Thanks very much for your help! > > Cheers, Chris. > -- > _ __ __ _ > / __/ / ,__(_)_ | Chris Wilson -- UNIX Firewall Lead Developer | > / (_ ,\/ _/ /_ \ | NetServers.co.uk http://www.netservers.co.uk | > \__/_/_/_//_/___/ | 21 Signet Court, Cambridge, UK. 01223 576516 | > > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
