On Sat, 22 May 2004, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 11:19:26PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Just FYI...
>
> thanks for checking this for us ...
And a thanks from me also. I hope I didn't sound too much like an
belligerent ass.
> Roderick: I asked Ryan to do those tests for us
> to check the impact of linux vserver on typical
> applications ...
OK, my lack of knowledge of what unixbench is and not taking enough time
to check it out before shooting the message off. (End of a long
frustrating day of 'almost' completed mini-projects.)
> so the overhead of linux vserver on the host
> is not measurable (it seems that it is slightly
> faster than a vanilla kernel, but within the
> expected and measured noise)
Ah.
> and the overhead inside a vserver is roughly
> 2% which leaves us with 98% of the native
> performance ...
I got that feeling but wasn't sure if the numbers reflected good or bad.
> > Test machine:
> > Dual Xeon 2.8GHz
> > Fedora Core 2
> > binutils-2.15.90.0.3
> > gcc-3.3.3
> > util-vserver-0.29-214
I lust! Turns out the quad Xenon I am suppose to get is still a couple of
months away. They're testing the replacement systems before completely
switching over. (Typically a good idea especially when 'they' are running
Windows 2003 server. :-)
Rod
--
"Open Source Software - You usually get more than you pay for..."
"Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL"
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
