Alberto Cammozzo said: > I see a much more interesting solution with the two host servers > sharing vservers between them: each one taking the vservers hosted > by the other in case of its failure. This allows to use both host > servers at time. I think this requires true (both read-write) shared > storage, which I haven't at the moment. > > I described this in theory in [0]. Sorry, in Italian. I'll translate > if someone is interested. Perhaps you can look at the figures :)
Can't you get the same result by having multiple drbd mount mounts with each drbd mount being active on 1 server and passive on the other? -- Luke Computer Science System Administrator Security Administrator,College of Engineering Montana State University-Bozeman,Montana _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
