On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 23:35, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 07:44:02PM +0200, Bernhard Duebi wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 23:35, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Bernhard Duebi wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 15:15, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 03:04:48PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] > > As stated above I configured 2 Interfaces lo 127.X.0.1/8 and eth0 > > 10.13.2.X/23. portmap gets requests on the lo interface and I can ssh to > > the eth0 interface. I also have postfix running, which listens on the lo > > interface and sends mail on the eth0 interface. > > > > What about the SIOCGIFADDR ioctl ? > > what about it? > > it means, 'the requested ip (insert portmap ip here) > can not be assigned to an interface or socket' > > what are you trying to do, what is your exact config, > which kernel do you test, what do you expect? > > using 127.X.0.1 with X!=0 seems somewhat strange, > what is the idea behind this? 'normal' vservers do > not use lo device, because this is a security hole > per definition ...
Ok, let's turn it the other way round. Does someone run a nfs-server in a 'normal' vserver (no hacks, no unofficial patches) ? If yes, could you please send me your setup ? Thank you very much. Cheers Bernhard _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
