hmm, now you've got me confused ... On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 03:46:02PM +0300, Ehab Heikal wrote: > Yes I know most of the time this is the case,
that open source drivers work with mainline kernels? > but still I would feel more comfortable buying such a product which product? > if I could do a RH 2.4X kernel. well, a vserver patched RH kernel is not a RH kernel anymore, so the same 'not supported' would apply, right? > Does any one know how or if it has already been done what? patched the redhat kernels? best, Herbert > Arne Blankerts wrote: > > >On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 14:35, Ehab Heikal wrote: > > > >>Has anyone patched the RedHat kernels rather than plainvanilla > >>kernel.org kernels? Are there any problems with it? Are they available > >>for download anywhere? > >>I need them since a specific driver supports only RH kernels or so its > >>vendor says. > > > >If that's not a binary-only driver, that's pretty much going to be > >bullshit. They may only "support" offical rh-kernels, but the driver is > >supposed to work in any kernel of the same version. > > > >Mit freundlichen Gr��en/Regards, > > Arne Blankerts > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
