Sandino, Thanks for these comments. Glad to learn more about LSM and its problems.
Best regards, Marc -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sandino Araico S�nchez Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 3:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Vserver] Re: BSDJAILS in 2.6.x as LSM? Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote: >Based on my reading of perf. numbers published in LSM's USENIX security >conference, LSM does not impact performance any more significantly than >vserver does. I.e., the numbers are so small that it doesn't really appear >to make a big difference. Correct me if I wrong! I cannot comment on LSM >being well tested or not. > > LSM seems not to have good acceptance in other security projects: http://www.grsecurity.net/lsm.php http://www.rsbac.org/documentation/lsm.php >More importantly, my hope is that by moving to LSM it is possible to stack >other security systems on top of vserver. > GR Security combines conflictless with linux-vserver without any need for LSM. http://www.linux-vserver.org/index.php?page=grsecurityHowto _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
