On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 03:12:35PM +0300, Alexander Suvorov wrote: Hey Say! good to hear that you are still working on freevps? with Alexey ...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tuesday 21 September 2004 14:57, Brian wrote: > > > Konrad, I have change everything bevor I mail to the list ... It's not a > > problem with the vserver number4 . I shut down the Vserver. ping the IP of > > the vserver. normay I must get a timeout. but the dummy interface is > > pinging back with a wrong IP. > > > > Alex , > > "patches against vs1.3.6 and vs1.24 are always welcome ;)" I use > > util-vserver-0.30 and patch patch-2.4.27-rc2-vs1.28.diff.. > > > > "routes for this addess be cached in rt_cashe." how to ??? > > Brian, to avoid this problem the vserver strongly requires > to mark all kernel route cache entries with context id > or to separate this route cache table by contexts. probably I'm too <wossname> to see the 'problem' which leads to a separated route cache for _not_ routed packets ... > this has already done several months ago in freevps project > (http://freevps.com), but not implemented into the vserver > project yet. exactly because I don't see a good reason for adding this ... best, Herbert > > ---- Original Message ----- > > From: "Alex Lyashkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 1:07 PM > > Subject: Re: [Vserver] eth0 + dummy0 > > > > ?? ??????, 21.09.2004, ?? 13:53, Konrad Korzeniowski ??????????: > > > Brian napisa??(a): > > > > I cannot understand.. > > > > > > > > I have a Hostsystem with > > > > > > > > eth0 = Internet address > > > > dummy0 = Privat address > > > > > > > > 1 Vserver with Privat address bind on dummy0 > > > > 2 Vserver with Internet and Privat address. > > > > > > > > its running well, fast and stable. > > > > > > > > yesterday I install Vserver number 4 with Internet and Privat address > > > > too. It's running well too.. I install apache and mail ... I go to the > > Webinterface of my software in this new vServer. everything running well. 5 > > minutes later the 4. Vserver are offline .. I try to ping but nothing is go > > . restart vserver ... nothing changed... > > > > > > I go to the Host system and ping the IP .. > > > > > > > > ping 83.xxx.yy.zz > > > > PING 83.xxx.yy.zz (83.xxx.yy.zz): 56 data bytes > > > > 64 bytes from 10.49.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.0 ms > > > > 64 bytes from 10.49.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.0 ms > > > > 64 bytes from 10.49.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.0 ms > > > > 64 bytes from 10.49.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.0 ms > > > > > > > > 10.49.0.1 is the dummy0 of the host system .. > > > > > > > > why !!?? > > > > > > > > when the server are down, it's the same .. > > > > > > > > I don't know whats rong .. > > > > > > My solution was changing order of IP addresses in config file > > > (IPROOT) - first one should be public address. But my problem occurs > > > only with such applications as razor2, pyzor... with iptraf I've > > > discoverd that tcp packets with private source address are trying > > > to get out trough 'public' interface (ip_forwarding = 0, no iptables) > > > > > > Looks like this setting influences somehow routing - is it possible? > > > > > > (2.4.26-vs1.27) > > > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg05959.html > > - -- > Alexander Suvorov > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFBUBq4xjHOd7EAl8MRAuSTAJsEMwwSmv0jwgyW3ZBq/Lq9/zbXNACfcIO9 > 3Pssr0X92MbOo6ASdleA/V4= > =Omnr > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
