On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 09:48:27AM +1300, Sam Vilain wrote: > Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > >up to 16 addresses are currently allowed in this set > >in the future the limit will go away (network code is > >actually the oldest piece) by using 'markings' > >(network is virtualized to allow binding to 0.0.0.0) > > Interesting. Is it the intention that these changes be entirely > transparent to host-based firewall implementations (is that possible?), > or entirely administered by them?
although the former would be the better solution, the latter one seems more realistic to me ... > Or some mixture? probably, any good ideas are welcome, as usual ;) best, Herbert > -- > Sam Vilain, sam /\T vilain |><>T net, PGP key ID: 0x05B52F13 > (include my PGP key ID in personal replies to avoid spam filtering) > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
