J�rn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > New-variant cowlinks are closer to symlinks than anything else. > Like symlinks they allocate an extra inode per link. Like fast > symlinks for ext[23] they store the link information in the inode > itself. > > Still, don't think of it as a symlink, it's not. Close, but > different.
I think it's a very good idea, but do you know if mmaping several cow-linked files that way would give us the same benefits than (sym)links which is to have it only once into memory? -- Olivier Poitrey _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
