On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 12:20, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 01:51:54AM +0200, Gilles wrote: > > > > > > > Personally I would go for 802.1q vlan's, but that's my personal opinion. > > > > > > > > Thanks for the suggestion; I'll keep it mind, although I currently can't > > > > test this because my ethernet is 10Mb/s. > > > > > > and how would that be related? > > > > I don't know :-|. I found an article: > > http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=7268 > > which says > > "As a side note, 802.1q is defined on only 100Mbps or higher Ethernet; it > > does not support 10Mbps." > > > > Should I assume otherwise? > > hmm, 802.1Q refers to 802.3 and this includes > all 10BASE* standards too, so I'd assume it is > well defined for that too, which doesn't mean > that your network hardware supports it ... 802.1Q (or vlan) is an addition to all ethernet standards (10Base*, 100Base*, 1000Base*) AFAIK, however tagging vlans on interfaces requires that all equipment in between has to support 802.1Q as well.
-- Regards, Dennis Roos Network Engineer InTouch N.V. Middenweg 76 1097 BS Amsterdam Tel: +31 (0)20 6752060 Fax: +31 (0)20 6758429 _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
