On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 09:30:14PM +0200, Bernhard Duebi wrote: > On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 10:42, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:20:00PM +0200, Bernhard Duebi wrote: > > > On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 19:14, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:44:39PM +0200, Bernhard Duebi wrote: > > > > > You can easely reproduce it. Just start portmapper within a vserver and > > > > > you see two lines in /var/log/messages > > > > > > > > well, tested here with 1.9.2.29, and the portmapd > > > > (mandrake) starts fine inside a vserver with limited > > > > IPs (chbind) ... > > > > > > > > you can also 'remove' or not set the VXF_HIDE_NETIF > > > > to make _all_ interfaces visible to a vserver > > > > (without givin any additional caps) > > > > > > My host is SuSE Linux 9.1 Pro, with kernel 2.6.8.1-vs1.9.2 and > > > util-vserver 0.30.193. I have 3 vservers, 1 debian sarge, 1 fedora core > > > 2 and 1 suse 9.1, all created with vserver name build. > > > All vservers show the same problem. In the attached files you find some > > > information on the vservers and the kernel. Maybe you can tell me what's > > > wrong. > > > > first I'd remove those 127.x.x.x entries on lo > > those for sure will confuse some apps and are > > not needed ... > > done that > > > then try with a single ip assigned as an alias > > and add the VXF_HIDE_NETIF to the config, let > > me know what your portmap reports with -dv > > in the attachment you find 2 sets of files. The files with "flags" in > the name are with the VXF_HIDE_NETIF flag. The others are without any > flags. The results are basicaly the same.
hmm, which attachment? best, Herbert > Hope this helps. > Bernhard > > > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
