Herbert Poetzl wrote:
not that I'm aware of, but memory fragmentation
is a general problem (see lkml and Macelo working on
that stuff), so I'd suggest to try with a vanilla
I understand there's something wrong there with 2.6 kernels...
kernel (no vserver patches) and wait until theIn my case it's just order-0 allocations. What is strange is that it seems related
order-4 allocation fails (which is probably after
to the TCP treason uncloacked seen -which should not be the case as if I understand correctly, order-0 allocation error just means
a temporary failure ?-
a few hours of stress testing)
Rsync seems very good at that ...
For my part, testing without vserver will be very hard... This means relocating all others vservers & put the vserver programs
at the host level. Definitively not something I can do in some minutes.
anyway, I'll revisit the vserver code in the next view days and will have a deep look for possible connections ...
HTH, Herbert
Could be a good idea.
In the same time I'll dig a bit further. For exemple I used this on the kernel config
Allocate 3rd-level pagetables from highmem -> Y
Maybe this has the exact reverse effect ?? I change this to No & boot another kernel in some minutes...
Sincerely yours,
-- Yann Dupont, Cri de l'universit� de Nantes Tel: 02.51.12.53.91 - Fax: 02.51.12.58.60 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
