FC3 seems pretty stable:
# cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg)
# uptime
15:13:32 up 40 days, 17:59, 2 users, load average: 0.04, 0.05, 0.01
# uname -a
Linux XXX 2.6.9-vs1.9.3x #11 SMP Thu Dec 9 21:10:52 EST 2004 i686 i686 i386
GNU/Linux
Grisha
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Eric Jorgensen wrote:
This thread actually brings up a good question I've
been meaning to ask. I've set of several vserver
machines with several dozen guests, all on a RH9 base:
kernel-2.4.22ctx-17c
kernel-2.4.25-vs1.26
kernel-2.4.26-vs1.28smp
I've now been looking to make a switch for my host OS.
I was less than impressed with Fedora Core 1 and 2,
but have been quite pleased with Fedora Core 3, at
least on the desktop. And since it does have a 2.6
series kernel, I'm contemplating switching to it. But
I'd rather wait for the platform to completely stable
before moving. I'd rather not be changing/upgrading
every week. I'd also like to transparently move my
existing vserver guests. I am RH/Fedora leaning.
Where are others going with their 2.6 installations,
especially those wanting to be on the "trailing" edge?
Thanks,
Eric
--- Tomas Fasth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Talking about uptime and stability; The following is
an old
installation of ours still serving customers;
serverhost$ uname -rvm
2.4.20-mppe+ctx+xfs+vlan-k7 #1 Mon Sep 15 11:18:51
CEST 2003 i686
serverhost$ echo $(uptime) # getting rid of double
spaces
15:07:55 up 490 days, 8:24, 1 user, load average:
0.02, 0.03, 0.00
serverhost$ sudo vserver-stat | expr $(wc -l) - 2
32
Well, not much of a load for the moment. But still
... ;)
// Tomas
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
