> But please think not technical but psychological ( = marketing) aspect. > when you do a vserver hosting business, customer would ask you like > "is really isolated perfectly?". and understand customer is not > a specialist of Linux. From this 'marketing' angle no virtualisation technique fits and never will. Vserver is very practical solution and everything that matters is virtualised and isolated from other vservers.
> 2. I suppose the biggest issue current vserver lacks is, a filesystem. > a filesystem like unionfs or Copy-on-Write(Cow) or something alike is > very desired but it lacks currently. Do you have any plan to add this As you know there are COW-links in the works,and you can always use cowloop, but this requires keeping your data in file, and additional mountpoint for every vserver, which might be a management nightmare. Besides, Bertl doesen't like cowloop. > BTW, I also am planning a new file system for Vserver. that would be interesting, could you please elaborate on that. -- Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9 We're giving you a new chance in life, and an opportunity to screw it up in a new, original way. _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [email protected] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
