On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:16:39AM -0800, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
> > no, typically util-vserver will suit your needs quite well
> > of course if you like the older (about one year) tools
> > better (for whatever reason), then feel free to use them,
> > they should work in legacy mode quite well ...
>
> I'll add that Jacques is semi-actively working on the Vserver-utils
> packages. Since I support two other techs doing support on about 15
> Linux-based boxes with half those running Linux-Vserver and these other
> techs have grown very comfortable with the Linuxconf interface for their
> tasks. So I like to stay with Jacques work since it has the same look and
> feel for them ( and me ) as Linuxconf.
hmm, yeah, why not, but I guess it would be better to use
a/the linuxconf frontend (or whatever frontend) ontop of
the 'mainline' tools, and 'just' feed back issues, bugs,
enhancements or fixes to util-vserver ...
maybe Jack can comment on that?
best,
Herbert
> Rod
> --
> "Open Source Software - You usually get more than you pay for..."
> "Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
