* Herbert Poetzl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:39:25PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > * Ola Lundqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > >* util-vserver, do it work? > > > > no > > > > > > Thanks a lot for the information. It is good to know so I can take > > > actions so it will not be included (in that arch) if Debian ship with > > > x86_64 as a release arch. > > > > x86_64 isn't a release arch for Debian/sarge anyway. However, > > util-vserver (my own compiled one, I'm getting ready to try the version > > in Debian/unstable very shortly) worked just fine on amd64/x86_64. I > > havn't had any problems with it and would be suprised if I have any with > > the Debian package. I certainly don't think amd64/x86_64 should be > > excluded from util-vserver without alot more justification... > > could you please provide the dietlibc and > util-vserver which is working on x86_64?
heh, I havn't got dietlibc working. :) Not working w/ dietlibc isn't a
reason to drop util-vserver from Debian/amd64 though (which was what it
looked like Ola was implying he was going to do). This was with regular
glibc, and just for the record the Debian 0.30.204-4 package appears to
be working quite nicly on amd64.
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [email protected] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
