Cool now it will be called stable. I have one question, is virtual networking like with freevps doable? Or is it not there yet or not planned.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ehab Heikal Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 1:44 PM To: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem I am confused, if it is stable why is the 1.9 branch called development. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arne Blankerts Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 2:27 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 12:41 +0200, Ehab Heikal wrote: > how stable is the 2.6 branch of vserver, would you run it in a > production envoirnment. Stable is very relative definition [tm] I've been using the 2.6 branch on two production servers for quite some time now with no known problems. Actually, it's more stable then the 2.4 version ever was for me... CYA Arne _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [email protected] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [email protected] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [email protected] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
